Trajectory

Three trajectories. One path.

My personal trajectory is tied to my professional trajectory, which is itself tied to my technological trajectory. Separating them would lose the meaning of the path.

The person, the profession, the technology.

Each period can be read in three directions: who I was becoming, what I was learning to see, and what I was building.

2010 → 13
Personal

Intern, then developer

I had just taught myself web development. I built first to learn and become more autonomous.

Professional

Code as a craft

Integration, XML, Java, PHP, early internal systems and automation.

Technological

Functions, data, synchronization

The first primitives were very concrete tools for avoiding the same work twice.

2014
Personal

Master's degree in software architecture

I start looking at systems above the feature level.

Professional

From developer to architect

The question becomes as much about structure as implementation.

Technological

Rainbow-PHP

A public repository of reusable primitives for faster POCs and technical assembly.

2016 → 20
Personal

Changing the level of abstraction

I no longer only want to build faster. I want to understand how systems carry behavior.

Professional

Technical and solution architecture

Integrations, middleware, processes, platform choices and the link between business need and system.

Technological

Replication, BDI, IFML, BPMN

State, intents, models and flows appear in public code long before their current convergence.

2020 → 23
Personal

A less visible period

I publish little. The work becomes deeper and more solitary.

Professional

BPM expertise

Processes, decisions and models become a meeting point between business, architecture and execution.

Technological

Going beneath notations

Qubit takes shape during a period when much of the code and experimentation is not public.

2024 → 26
Personal

Writing again

I put more words around questions long explored through code.

Professional

From architecture to the enterprise

Capabilities, patrimony and governance become as important as the technical stack.

Technological

Qubit, Geometric Memory, Priostack

Older threads converge into a more coherent search around meaning, trajectory and execution.

The level of the problem changed with me.

Codemake it work
Applicationassemble
Systemarchitect
Processconnect business and execution
Capabilitywhat the enterprise knows how to do
Patrimonywhat it can reuse

I spent my career moving upstream through the flow.

At first I saw the result and the code. Then systems, processes, capabilities and finally intentions. Qubit and Priostack now try to make the journey in the other direction without losing meaning along the way.